Roland Barthe Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Roland Barthe - Essay Example difference is this: the work is a fragment of substance, occupying a part of the space of books, the Text is a methodological field† (From Work to Text – 156-7). Known for his many thought-provoking contributions to literary criticism, French semiotic Roland Barthes’ discourse on the difference of the ‘text’ and the ‘work’ is something that has been a subject of many deliberations. In deduction, ‘text’ is often placed secondary to ‘work’ in terms of implication. The primary notion is to not construe that all familiar works that have been around for ages can be classified as ‘works’ while all that are modern should be compartmentalized as ‘texts.’ Critics and general readers are also bent upon the difference of the two, consciously or unconsciously. It polarizes between the strict rules and adherence to fundamentals and the openness for interpretation and difference in association to what is good literature and bad literature, thus what the classics offer and what the moderns present. It is supposed therefore that a general predisposition incumbent upon the arbitrator, whether it is a ‘text’ or a ‘work,’ consolidates the classification primarily based on their subjectivity. What Barthes has opened and has continued to pursue us is in essence the core foundations of how literary pieces are perceived, distinctly elaborating on the divergence of our acuities. But the convergence of the fragmented substance of the work and the methodology of the text would incorporate a consensus for an auspicious